Description
The doctrine of Visistadvaita, expounded by Ramanuja, was developed into a sound system of philosophy by the most brilliant of his successors, Venkatanatha, 'popularly known as Vedanta Desika'. His chief contribution to the intellectual foundation of the system lay in the composition of the text of Tattva-mukta-kalapa, a treatise of significant philosophical import left for posterity.
In this volume, which is a study of Visistadvaita based on Tattva-mukta-kalapa, the line of arguments advanced by Vedanta Desika is closely followed. The major and important issues related to the philosophy of Visistadvaita--its basic ontological and epistemological approach, the concept of the individual self, God and universe, the idea of sadhana and mukti, and the doctrine of substance and attribute--are all brought within the purview of discussion. The contemporary rival schools represented by Carvakas, Buddhists and Jainas, Nyaya-Vaisesikas, Mimamsakas and the Advaitins, of both orthodox and unorthodox camps, are successfully encountered. In the textual light of Tattva-mukta-kalapa, the notion that Visistadvaita is a theological system is dispelled, and its philosophic core is established beyond doubt.
The author maintains 'the original orthodox style, so characteristic of the ancient Acaryas', in his delineation of topics; yet the exposition remains free from all kinds of scholastic trappings.
The volume is a definitive study of Visistadvaita doctrines, both in their 'philosophical as well as theological aspects. Its in-depth probe of 'the fundamental epistemological and philosophical issues...common to all schools' both in the East and the West makes its appeal to those interested 'in understanding the basic problems of philosophy.
About The Author
S. M. Srinivasa Chari (b. 1919, Mysore) has a brilliant academic record. He is an M. A. in Philosophy from the University of Mysore and a recipient of Ph.D. from the University of Madras. He is a finished Sanskrit scholar trained by eminent traditional teachers. He was a Research Scholar at the University of Madras and a Fellow of the Institute of Philosophy at Amalner in Maharashtra.
Dr. Chari joined the Ministry of Education, Government of India, after the completion of his university career. He retired in 1976 as Joint Educational Adviser.
Dr. Chari has travelled widely. He has participated in international conferences abroad and addressed learned assemblies at University Centres on aspects of Indian philosophy and religion. He is the author of Advaita and Visistadvaita and Vaisnavism
Visistadvaita is one of the great religio-philosophical systems of the world. There are very few modern critical expositions of it based on the bhasya, supplemented by later erudite works.
Dr. Srinivasa Chari has acquired quite a profound knowledge of Visistadvaita from great pundits with whom he studied for years the texts in original. His modern education has endowed him with the capacity to present classical ideas in a lucid and connected way.
Depending on the original texts, in particular on Vedanta Desika's Tattva-mukta-kalapa, Dr. Chari has written an excellent monograph which authoritatively expounds Visistadvaita. Moreover, it attempts to establish that this is a system of philosophy in conformity with logic and experience.
This Book attempts to present in a systematic way the fundamental doctrines of Visistadvaita Vedanta associated with Sri Ramanuja based on the study of Tattva-mukta-kalapa, the magnum opus of Sri Vedanta Desika, who was one of the most distinguished successors of Ramanuja. Although in recent years quite a few books have been written in English on the philosophy and religion of Ramanuja, Visistadvaita as a sound system of philosophy has not received the treatment it deserves. The emphasis placed by Ramanuja on the acceptance of savisesa Brahman or the personal Supreme Being endowed with attributes as the ultimate Reality of philosophy on the strength of the scriptural evidence has led some scholars to feel that Ramanuja's system is essentially theological. Theology understood in the correct sense as an enquiry into the nature of God, is no doubt an important part of Visistadvaita, even as it is in the case of many other Indian philosophical systems. But the Visistadvaita system has both a philosophical as well as theological aspect, and the former is of greater importance for the reason that it gives meaning and value to the latter. The meta-physical doctrines, developed by the Visistadvaitin on the basis of which the system is founded, cannot be understood easily unless one has made a deep study of ancient treatises in the original. Next to the Sri-bhiifYa of Ramanuja, there are two out- standing philosophical classics, Tattva-mukta-kalapa and Satadusani, written by Vedanta Desika. A study of these texts is an essential prerequisite for getting a deeper insight into Visistadvaita tenets. But these are highly technical works written in terse Sanskrit and presented in the classical style replete with subtleties of dialectical arguments. The two texts have therefore remained beyond the approach of ordinary scholars and modern students of philosophy. It is significant that barring passing references to the works, an authentic translation of them has not been attempted in any European language. Even among the existing scholars, brought up strictly in the traditional disciplines of scholarship, there are very few who can claim to have studied them fully. Realising the importance of these two treatises for a fuller understanding of Visistadvaita, I published 1961 a book, Advaita and Visistadvaita, covering a study of Satadusani, which is an important polemical work. I have now attempted to cover Tattva-mukta-kalapa, the other important classic, in the present book.
The main objective of this task is to remove a prevalent impression that Visistadvaita is primarily theology and establish that it is essentially a system of philosophy. It is a system which has been developed, apart from an appeal to scriptural authority, on the basis of well-formulated epistemological, ontological, cosmological and religious doctrines. If there is a single authentic work in which this fact has been demonstrated, it is in Tattva-mukta-kalapa of Vedanta Desika. The scope of this book is not confined to an exposition of Tattva-mukta-kalapa. Nor is it aimed merely at presenting a narrative account of Visistadvaita philosophy and religion. On the basis of the rich material contained in the original Sanskrit text, I have endeavoured to present a critical and comparative account of the basic doctrines of Visistadvaita in their logical sequence. In discussing these doctrines, I have paid greater attention to the underlying issues in order to bring out their philosophic significance. I have therefore avoided, to the extent possible, appeal to scriptural authority. I have also tried to present the doctrines in their original orthodox style, so characteristic of the ancient Acaryas, and therefore refrained from temptations to use the familiar concepts of Western philosophy by way of comparison, because this can often prove misleading.
So far as I am aware, it is for the first time that an attempt is being made to present in English the Visistadvaita doctrines comprehensively on the basis of this authoritative text. Anyone interested in an in-depth study of Visistadvaita Vedanta will find this book invaluable. The doctrines discussed in the book are related to the fundamental epistemological and philosophical issues, which are common to all schools of philosophic thought whether in the East or the West. The book will therefore be useful to all those who are interested in understanding the basic problems of philosophy.
In a work of this type, it is difficult to avoid the use of technical terms in Sanskrit. I have however tried to minimise their use. Wherever I have adopted the Sanskrit words in the body of the text for want of an appropriate English equivalent, I have given the nearest English equivalent. Wherever I have used English terms, I have also given in brackets the Sanskrit words to avoid possible misunderstanding. Sanskrit quotations used in the body of the book have also been explained in English. Except for the commonly used words, all Sanskrit words have been diacritically marked. I have also given a glossary of the Sanskrit terms. I have taken special pains to express the highly technical subject matter in an as simple and lucid manner as possible so that even lay readers should have little difficulty in understanding the book.
In the preparation of this book I have confined my study mainly to the original Sanskrit works on Visistadvaita, drawing material primarily from Vedanta Desikas Tattva-mukta-kalapa and the commentaries thereon, Satadusani, Nyaya-siddhanjana and Nyaya-parisuddhi as well as Ramanuja's Sri-bhasya along with Sruta-prakasika. The other books consulted are indicated in the footnotes. I have also consulted the leading scholars in South India on Vedanta in an attempt to make this book as authoritative a version of the Visistadvaita doctrines as possible. I hope the book will be a useful contribution to the study of philosophy in general and Vedanta in particular. It is with great pleasure that I record my obligations. I must first pay my respects to my revered guru, the late Sri Gostipuram Sowmyanarayanacharyaswami (1878-1943), under whose feet I had the rare privilege and fortune of studying Vedanta in the traditional manner. But for his initiation into the essentials of the Visistadva ita philosophy and his blessings, it would have been impossible for me to accomplish the study of Satadilta1Ji and Tattva-mukta-kalapa. I also owe my success in the present undertaking to another guru, the late Sri Madhurantakam Veeraraghavacharyaswami (1900-83) under whom I studied the original text. I am deeply indebted to both of these Acaryas.
I should also pay my respects to His Holiness Abhinava Ranganatha Brahmatantra Parakalaswami (1884-1966) whose blessings received in my early age have enabled me to understand Visi~tadvaita philosophy. Though I could not study directly under him, I have had the opportunity of receiving considerable knowledge and benefit in the preparation of the present book from three of his learned disciples-Sri Saragur Varadachar, Sri K. S. Varadachar and Sri E. S. Varadachar, As a token of my gratitude to them and also in recognition of the unique contribution made to Visistadvaita Vedanta by H.H. Parakalaswami by his scholarly commentaries on Sri-bhasya and Tattva-mukta-kalapa, I respectfully dedicate the book to him.
I owe a debt of gratitude to Prof. S. Srinivasaraghavan who was kind enough to go through the entire manuscript and offer valued criticism and helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to my esteemed friends, Prof. L. V. Rajagopal and Sri S. Srinivasachar, who have read through the entire typescript and made useful suggestions for improvement. I should also thank Prof. S. s, Raghavachar, Dr. N. S. Anantharangachar, Sri K. S. Krishna Tatachar and Sri A. Srinivasaraghavan who looked through a portion of the typescript and offered useful comments. Prof. T. R. V. Murti, who recently passed away, went through the typescript and came out with a number of valuable suggestions. I express my indebtedness to the departed soul. My thanks are due to all those who have helped me in one way or another .and, in particular, to my wife without whose loving cooperation. I would not have been able to complete this book. I should also express my grateful thanks to the esteemed Professor K. Satchidananda Murty for an evincing keen interest in my work and for graciously writing the Foreword.
Â
Â
Foreword | vii |
Preface | ix |
Scheme of Transliteration | xvii |
List of Abbreviation | xix |
INTRODUCTION | 1 |
Meaning of the Term Visistadvaita  1;  Development of Visistadvaita as a Ssystem of Philosophy  2;  Vedanta Desika and Visistadvaita  5; Tattva-Mukta-Kalpa as a Philosophical Treatise  7;  Nature and Scope of Tattva-Mukta-Kalpa  9;  Substance of Tattva-Mukta-Kalpa  12;  Central Theme of Tattva-Mukta-Kalpa  15;  Scope of the Present Book  16
 |
|
Chapter One | Â |
FUNDAMENTAL METAPHYSICAL CATEGORIES | 22 |
Definition and Classification of Categories  22;  The Concept of Substance and Attribute  26;  Visistadvaita View  26;  Criticism of Buddhist view Denying Substance  28;  Criticism of Advaitin's Theory of Difference as Illusory  32;  Criticism of Bhaskara's Theory of Bhedabheda  35;  Criticism of the Jaina Theory of Anekanta  38;  The Concept of Relation  42;  Nayaa-Vaisesika Theory of Samavaya  42;  Visistadvaita Theory of Aprthak-siddhi  43;  The Concept of Body-Soul Relation  47;  The Concept of Cause and Effect  52;  Ontological Implication of Causality  52;  Criticism of Carvaka View of Causality  54;  Criticism of Advaitin's Theory of Causality  55;  Criticism of Nyaya-Vaisesika Theory of Cause and effect  59;  Criticism of the Sankhya Theory of Cause and Effect  61;  Criticism of the Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness  63;  Conclusion  72
 |
|
Chapter Two | Â |
PRAMANAS AND THEIR VALIDITY | 73 |
Perception  74;  Nature and Content of Pratyaksa  74;  Advaitin's Theory of Nirvikalpaka Pratyaksa  75;  Criticism of Buddhist Theory of Savikalpaka Pratyaka  78;  Criticism of Bhartrhari's Theory of Sabda-dhyasa  80;  The Theory of Supernormal Perception  82;  Inference  84;  Anumana as a valid and an Independent Pramana  84;  Method of Estabishing Logical Concomitance  87;  Type of Syllogism  88;  The Components of syllogism  90;  Logical Fallacies  91;  Rules Governing the Logical Argument  92;  Rules Regulating Philosophic Debate  94;  Verbal Testimony  96;  Sabda as a Valid and Independent Pramana  96;  Authoritativeness of the Veda  99;   Vedas and Agamas of Other Schools  104;  Authoritativeness of Smrtis and Puranas  105;  Authoritativeness of Pancaratra Agama  106;  Other Pramanas  107;  Smrti  107;  Upamana  109;  Arthapatti  111;  Anupalabdhi  111;  Relative validity of Pramanas  113
 |
|
Chapter Three | Â |
LOGICAL IMPORT OF WORDS AND SENTENCES | 116 |
Criticism of Mimamsa Theory  117;  Connotation and Denotation of Words  121;  Criticism of Sphotavada  126;  Buddhist Theory of Vakyrtha  128;  Function of Words in Sentence  129;  Import of Samanadhikarana-vakya  131;  Import of Kaksana-vakya  137
 |
|
Chapter Four | Â |
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE | 140 |
Knowledge as n Attribute of Jiva  140; Knowledge as Self-Luminous  142;  Knowledge as Eternal  147;  Knowledge as Substance  150;  The Theory of Transcendental Knowledge  153
 |
|
Chapter Five | Â |
KNOWLEDGE AND THE EXTERNAL WORLD | 158 |
Subject-Object Relation  159;  Theory of Visistadvaita  160;  Criticism of Yogacara Buddhist Theory of Knowledge  161;  Criticism of Sautranttka Buddhist Theory of Knowledge  167;  Criticism of the Theory of Madhyamika Buddhist  169;  Theory of Truth and Error  171;  Criticism of Buddhist Theories of Error  173;  Criticism of Advaitin's Theory of Error  175;  Theory of Satkhyati  176;  Theory of Akhyati  179;  Criticism of the Theory of Anyathakhyati  180;  Self-Validity of Knowledge  183
 |
|
Chapter Six | 187 |
THE DOCTRINE OF JIVA | Â |
Jiva as Different form Body and Mind  188;  Jiva as the Subject of Knowledge  191;  Jiva as Self-Luminous  193;  Jiva as Eternal  195;  Jiva as Karta and Bhokta  197;  Theory of Free-Will and Determinism  201;  Plurality of the Individual Selves  203;  Criticism of Ekajivavada  205;  Jiva as Anu  207;  Criticism of Jaina Theory of Jiva  208;  Criticism of Nyaya Theory of Jiva as Vibhu  209;  Jiva and Brahman  212
 |
|
Chapter Seven | 216 |
Proofs for the Existence of God  217;  Criticism of Nyaya Arguments for Existence of God  219;  The Nature of Ultimate Reality  223;  The Theory of Nirguna Brahman  229;  God and His Attributes  232;  Material Causality of Brahman  242;  Criticism of Yadavaprakasa Theory  243;  Criticism of Bhaskara's Theory  245;  Criticism of Vivartavada  245;  Visistadvaita Theory of Brahman as Material Cause of Universe  246
 |
|
Chapter Eight | Â |
BRAHMAN AND UNIVERSE | 251 |
Criticism of the Doctrine of Avidya  252;  Criticism of the Theory of Universe as Illusory  260;  Universe as an Integral Part of Brahman 271
 |
|
Chapter Nine | Â |
SADHANA ANDMUKTI | 277 |
Eligibility of Jiva for Moksa  277;   Bhakti as the Means to Moksa  280;  Theories of Jnana as the Means to Moksa  287;  Place of Karma in the Spiritual Discipline  295;  Karma and Upasana  300;  Removal of Punya and Papa by Upasana  302;  Path to Moksa  306;  The Nature of Mukti  307;  Criticism of Other Theories of Mukti  310;  Criticism of the Theory of Jivan-Mukti 314
 |
|
Chapter Ten | Â |
PRAKRTI AND ITS EVOLUTES | 317 |
Nature and Order of Evolution  317;  Theory of Pancikarana  321;  Criticism of Sankhya and Naiyayika Theories of Evolution  323;  Nature of the Sense Organs  324;  Theory of Space (Akasa)  328;  Nature of Other Elements  331;  The Element of Vayu  331;  The Element of Agni  334;  The Element of Prithivi  335;  The Theory of Time (Kala)  337;  The Doctrine of Nitya-Vibhuti  340
 |
|
Chapter Eleven | Â |
FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTES | 344 |
Visistadvaita Theory of Attributes  344;  Attributes of Cosmic Matter  344;  Attributes of the Five Elements  345;  Sakti as an Attribute of Causal Substances  350;  Samyoga as Relation  351;  Nayaya-Vaisesika Theory of Attributes  353;  Material Attribute  354;  Mental Attributes  361;  Ethical Attributes  365;  Other Categories  369;  Nayaya Theory of Karma  369;  Nyaya Theory of Samanya  371;  Visistadvaita Concept of Jati  373;  The Concept of Visesa  377;  The Concept of Abhava  378
 |
|
Chapter Twelve | Â |
GENERAL ESTIMATE AND CONCLUSION
 |
382 |
Glossary | 401 |
Bibliography | 415 |
Index | 417 |